<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Distribution Scuffle or Industry Re-Shuffle?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.airpluscommunity.com/2011/blog/distribution-scuffle-or-industry-re-shuffle/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.airpluscommunity.com/2011/blog/distribution-scuffle-or-industry-re-shuffle</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:48:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard clowes</title>
		<link>http://www.airpluscommunity.com/2011/blog/distribution-scuffle-or-industry-re-shuffle/comment-page-1#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>richard clowes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airpluscommunity.com/?p=2368#comment-189</guid>
		<description>An interesting chess match to follow. Is there a place for a GDS in the future...absolutely! If the GDS&#039;s position is comprimised then the result is that the CTD&#039;s/Travel Agencies will have to build and PAY for their own solutions to aggregate the data. I have a novel idea... what not keep the GDS, and re do the financial model. Reduce airline fees they charge and reduce/eliminate the Agency &quot;incentive&quot; checks. Net result - the airlines pay less (their ultimate goal in this war) and the GDS&#039;s still maintain their prominent position in the process. Sure, the TMC&#039;s/CTD&#039;s will not be happy no longer getting that income check but it&#039;s cheaper than developing solutions to aggregate the data. Why re-invent the wheel? Isn&#039;t that what a GDS is?

Lets hope people keep their cool and there&#039;s still a practical solution to this at the end of the day. AA step down off your high horse! SABRE - think outside the box!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting chess match to follow. Is there a place for a GDS in the future&#8230;absolutely! If the GDS&#8217;s position is comprimised then the result is that the CTD&#8217;s/Travel Agencies will have to build and PAY for their own solutions to aggregate the data. I have a novel idea&#8230; what not keep the GDS, and re do the financial model. Reduce airline fees they charge and reduce/eliminate the Agency &#8220;incentive&#8221; checks. Net result &#8211; the airlines pay less (their ultimate goal in this war) and the GDS&#8217;s still maintain their prominent position in the process. Sure, the TMC&#8217;s/CTD&#8217;s will not be happy no longer getting that income check but it&#8217;s cheaper than developing solutions to aggregate the data. Why re-invent the wheel? Isn&#8217;t that what a GDS is?</p>
<p>Lets hope people keep their cool and there&#8217;s still a practical solution to this at the end of the day. AA step down off your high horse! SABRE &#8211; think outside the box!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Willy Schnyder</title>
		<link>http://www.airpluscommunity.com/2011/blog/distribution-scuffle-or-industry-re-shuffle/comment-page-1#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Willy Schnyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.airpluscommunity.com/?p=2368#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Very interesting survey results and no clear indication seen as per today, where we are heading to!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting survey results and no clear indication seen as per today, where we are heading to!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

